Everything Was Fine – Poetry Lyrics 3-5

By Alfred Brown

This is the poem where I finally got to use the sentence that had been rattling in my brain for a few years “Everything was fine until I got shot in the face.”  I wrote it first sometime, probably around 2013, then I did some edits to it around 2014 or 2015.  The intention with the edits was to make the poems into songs.

3 -losing ground

Losing ground
Can’t stay around
Shifting, sliding
Can’t keep fighting

Nothing goes right it all changes
Can’t keep up with the various stages

First it seems fine then it goes wrong
Starts quick but then it takes too long

Someday it’s gonna be diff’rent
Until then it’s the same lament

Don’t know how I’m going to fix
Maybe go back, back to the sticks

4 -Convincing Lie

Love is just a convincing lie
We tell ourselves when we cry
But don’t ask me to explain why
It’s both the reason to live and die

5 -just a game

I asked a girl for her number
Apparently she had only six
Another said to come on over
She wanted a computer fix
Online in my area there’s a lover
Popup said just a few clicks
Mama said shop around for her
But they’re all shopping their pics

you know it’s all just a game
Doesn’t matter by any name
You feel it pointless, call it lame
But you’ll play it just the same

She says sure, she’d love to go out
But another night, tonight she’s busy
Five times and you start to doubt
About just how really busy is she
You get drunk, this new chick’s okay
not that hot but you’d go for a fling
Drove her home, she says, next day
She calls five times, you let it ring

Drinking can make you eager
Gives you guts and some balls
But when results come out meager
It then sucks as hope falls
Drinking can make her looser
And forget what her mama said
But another guy comes and boosts her
She drank your cash, left with him instead

Everything Was Fine – Poetry Lyrics 1-2

By Alfred Brown

This is the poem where I finally got to use the sentence that had been rattling in my brain for a few years “Everything was fine until I got shot in the face.” I wrote it first sometime, probably around 2013, then I did some edits to it around 2014 or 2015. The intention with the edits was to make the poems into songs.

1 -woke up so tired

Woke up so tired went to sleep wide awake

2 -it's just over

Too much time has passed
It all went by so fast
And now it’s just over
Did i even know her?
Or was i wrong to think
That we had a special link
One that can’t be broken
More than just a token

It’s just over, all over
I’m sinking lower and lower
Like it was nothing to her
Like we never were

Something magical, pure
But now I’m not so sure
Because she’s gone away
She’s off and on her way
To love another her new life
You know it don’t seem right
That she should break a chain
That may not come again

11. If writing can be considered a kind of salvation or enlightenment process for your soul, how are you saved/enlightened by writing?

presents “Two Voices” – a discussion about writing
by 2 writers, Alfred Brown and Anh Thi
 (male) ALFRED (female) ANH
            That’s a tough one, as I’d first have to consider writing as a way to save or enlighten my soul. Saving a soul suggests it must first be lost or damned.   Sounds like Christianity and original sin.

And for Christianity, salvation comes in kind acts and a moral life. Enlightening a soul, as opposed to a mind, suggests it is not about acquiring knowledge as much as it is reaching some kind of spiritual height or liberation.   Sounds like Buddhism/Hinduism and approaching nirvana. And for them it comes through meditation and non-attachment.

No religion I know suggests writing as a way to get to the goal.

Writing helps me work through issues. It’s not the approach of someone putting their thoughts down in a diary.

Rather, it’s taking something big or small that I observe in myself, in the world, or in other people, and creating a story to explore the dynamics and struggle of it.

That’s where the enlightenment comes in for me. I am enlightened by writing out how an idea evolves, and what I learn about the issue and myself is a catharsis.

 

           So that leaves me with inventing a religion so that a soul can get fixed in some way through writing. And inventing a religion to satisfy some convenient goal, be it to divorce your wife, or because that’s where the money is, or to answer a question, is not something I’m interested in.

If I invent a religion (or a semblance of one), it will be because I honestly think society could benefit from a new philosophy and dictum for living.

Does writing save me? To the extent that it allows me to express myself.

Without the ability to express myself through writing, I would wither into mindlessness. And then nothing would matter.

I am a dynamic force for myself, in my world, for my family and friends because I learn, think, explore and come into being through my writing.

10. Writers usually don’t make a living writing. What is your day job?

presents “Two Voices” – a discussion about writing
by 2 writers, Alfred Brown and Anh Thi

(female) ANH

I’m a lawyer – per day job. As with anything, it was a journey to get to the lawyering part.  Before that, I taught English at a junior high school.  Before that, I dipped my toe in at workshops at East West Players. Then I went on to get my Masters in Professional Writing at USC. 

Writing is what I wanted to do.  It is the ultimate form of expression for me. It’s a thought that comes to life, a way to give me space to be myself, and a tool to help others give expression to themselves.  For a day job, ultimately lawyering was the best fit because it involved reading and writing.

so I went to school to study it.

(male) ALFRED

Currently, I’m a program manager / business analyst in software, with shades of engineering/development. How I got there was unexpected.

            Pre-6th grade: For English, we had vocabulary assignments were we had to create sentences using a list of words. I think we had to actually use context to prove we knew each word; otherwise, we could just write “___ is a word in my vocabulary list.”

Well, I knew the word, and making a dictionary was boring, so I thought I’d write a little story. If the words were “cafeteria,” “handkerchief,” and “kindergarten.”

I’d write:

The man and woman were eating next to each other at the cafeteria. She wiped her mouth with her handkerchief and dropped it for him to pick up. Just then, the man remembered he had to pick his son up from kindergarten.

Thus the story was dictated by the choice and order (alphabetical) of the words. I remembering liking this challenge, and made an otherwise extremely boring assignment more interesting. I never paid much attention to the fact I did this, never considered it writing, in fact mostly forgot about it, but many years later my mother ran into a teacher’s aide who graded my vocabulary assignments (I think from 2nd grade), and she said she always enjoyed reading my assignments most, because of these little narratives.
6th grade (circa ’92): My friend was into role playing games, the paper kind as well as video games. For a paper version we were going to make, he had some ideas for some cool weapons. I remember mostly planning for these games, far more than ever playing them, because that required far less cooperation from everyone.

He wanted some kind of back story to the items. With little more than the name of the item, such as “kraken boots”— I’d come up with a pretty elaborate back story. That’s when I first got feedback on my writing, and he was amazed that I came up with them immediately and pretty much effortlessly. That’s when I knew I wanted to write, or be a writer.
Junior high (’93-’94): I kept writing after the project with my friend fizzled, mostly the beginnings of stories I never finished.

I did a little journaling even, and in that journal I wrote that I was really worried about the apocalypse (I mostly blame those Time Life commercials or books on mystics and aliens that said we’re all going to die soon, so better read up about it).

But I thought about it while I did. I thought about what it would mean, namely, pain and disappointment. I know that was pretty dark view of the future even back then, because, well I have the writing to prove it.
High school (‘94-‘98): I started writing plays, teleplays (spec and pilot), short stories, vignettes, poetry, articles for my school newspaper, letters to science magazines (that never got published), and more.

But I was even more sure that writing was a bad idea, as more than a diversion, and diversions were pretty bad too. I was convinced that science and math were the way to go, artists die penniless and unknown, scientists and engineers had jobs and families. And I realized I was good at math and science, and the theoretical stuff about physics in the science magazines I was reading captured my imagination, at least more than anything else science/math. So I thought I’d go to college and become a physics major.
Undergraduate (’98-’03): I started as a physics major, but it wasn’t instantly quantum mysteries and the nature of the universe. It was instead a lot of very boring math. Perhaps I could have slogged through it, but I discovered something (let’s just reference it as the Thing) that made me not care so much about the fact that what I was drawn to (writing, art, music, all creative expression) wouldn’t make me money, and that freed me to do it even more.

I had taken an elective in an art class, The History of Film, with a professor which really made me look at art from an intellectual point of view that was really exciting. And the math just got more boring, especially with the Thing. So, I switched to Film, though I know it was exactly what my high school self would have warned me about, but, again, I was doing the Thing that made not care so much.

And I found I could do the Thing, my own creative expression, and get A’s in my art classes very easily.   I was nearly done with my four years, when I met a woman at a coffee shop where there was a poetry reading.

She turned out to be a psychopath, and everything changed. I lost my parent’s financial support, missed my finals, had to do another year to finish, lost my apartment. Only once I had nothing to give her, no money, no place to live, only then, when I tried to break it off, did she not cry and beg me to stay.
‘03-’06: I started on the floor of my college friend’s house. Sleeping in the area between the kitchen and living room still doing the Thing. They like to remind me that they only took me in because my parents would buy them an Xbox. I eventually moved up to garages. During this time, my jobs included retail, food delivery, low-level IT. My high-school self was right, a Visual Arts degree was pretty worthless. The rest of my time was doing creative endeavors and the Thing.
‘07-‘08: Well, first I had to move back home with my parents, because of yet another life-altering experience, not one I think I could have expected. I wallowed for about a year or so, not really leaving my bed for more than a little while at a time. Doing the Thing was pretty infrequent, as was creative endeavors, as was doing pretty much anything.
‘08-‘11: Then, my father, who was Computer Science faculty at a university, helped me get a poorly paying job there that at least was a good resume builder and related to the IT I did before. I worked there for about a year, then started my masters at that university (mostly paid for thanks to my father’s job, but I probably should have done an MBA instead of getting it in writing), and then expanded my job duties to include more that would help the resume, namely technical writing. I was cheap labor, so they let me. I knew technical writing was the cross-section I had. I didn’t have the cross-section of salesman and writer to make it as a creative writer. But I had the cross-section of tech and writer to make it as a technical writer.
‘11-‘12: Cheap as I was, it still ended. It took me a long time, and eventually a friend who showed me how to treat looking for a job like a job in itself, to find my first /real/ job as a technical writer. That got me into the door.

By this time the Thing was pretty much over. The degree, as well as that resume-building job, is what secured it. Being a technical writer made me a better a writer, in that it forced me to edit, forced me to write more than what I “enjoyed,” forced me to accept when something would just be completely thrown out and not used. It was easier to say good-bye to words I didn’t care about, and that helped me say good-bye (though, again, I keep all my drafts) to words I did. But that too ended.
‘14-‘16: I started with another company doing technical writing, but the job started to morph, and I let it morph because I realized that technical writing had a ceiling to it, a limit to its advancement and salary. I didn’t love it enough to want to do it for life, particularly at that pay.

Further, I found more than once I could write text of how to do something for someone, or I could just write code so a button could be pressed and it would do it for them. That turned out to be more desired by my employer. Yet again it seemed I was being shown that no one really wanted to read what I wrote, but I couldn’t blame them for wanting efficiency. And it turned out that writing did in fact help in programming and software customization, which I was doing more and more, as documentation helped me keep track of changes as well as create useful release notes.
’16-present: But that too ended. Then I took a contract that was pretty much engineering/development. But that too ended.

And now… Now I’m not really in a hurry to go back to my “day job.” I’m still looking, of course, but I realized something. I hated my jobs. I hated them all. Not with a burning passion, but with a mild contempt.

I liked often the people I worked with. But none of the things I did meant anything except they may have made the company I worked for some money, and they gave me some money in return. They had no loyalty to me (no more than 95% of all companies do nowadays) and I share their lack of sentimentality for them.

I don’t have the Thing to make me guilt-free when I do my creative projects, but I still do it, as the drive is still there. Maybe without the Thing, I’ll have a better shot at making the creative pay off. I have this desire to impact someone with my art/music/writing, the way art/music/writing has impacted me.

I can’t fight it, but I want to. Society maligns what I’m attracted to. Society wants me to be straight lacing, embraced by white collars, and I hate it. I want to want that.

And pretty soon I feel it, after I dawdle too long to try to fail, or fail too few to succeed but enough to fear continuing, I’ll probably go back to jobs I hate. Or maybe I’m just scared of the apocalypse.

9. Identify yourself as a writer.

presents “Two Voices” – a discussion about writing
by 2 writers, Alfred Brown and Anh Thi
      (male) ALFRED

What kind of writer am I?

I am… Reluctant.   Unrepentant. Ashamed. Angry.

      (female) ANH

What kind of writer am I?

I am a crazy, hardworking, foolish dramatist.

          RELUCTANT to call myself one, as it is not a proud claim.   A paid writer, that is different, and even then, a well-paid writer is all that really matters. It is easy to find someone to pay you pennies to blog.   But an un-paid, low-paid writer?   Better keep that to yourself. Crazy:

I think anyone who gets into any artistic field is a bit crazy. Because artists don’t see the world like most people. We stand outside the box, while trying to live in the box because that’s where most of our friends and family are. And it does drive us a bit crazy living inside the box, but forever lured to step out of bounds.

            UNREPENTANT in knowing my transgression and yet still continuing to transgress. And the only penance/salvation is to stop, get a job I hate, and make money. Because words alone cannot feed a family. Will writing make me better at a job that makes me money? Maybe, but that doesn’t justify not spending my time on improving directly transferrable skills or the job itself. Hardworking:

Writing is an obsession, and when I start, I keep going. That’s where the hardworking part comes into play.

I have written until my eyes ached, my fingers cramped, and my body hurt. But that’s a price I’ll pay to write.

            ASHAMED in how much writing I’ve done. I have mountains of writing. Every genre. Every format. And it seems like no one wants to read it, even I. Maybe they would if I knew how to package it, sell it, and sell myself in the process.

It seems the only people who succeed are those who are both a writer and a salesman. That’s a very small section of people, as writing is a solitary act, and sales is very much not. Supposedly they have agents for people to bridge that gap, but the big agents don’t take submissions, and the small ones are a crapshoot for quality.

You’re supposed to go through the small ones, many who supposedly won’t do a thing for you, and work up to big ones, and still you’re selling yourself, just now first to the agents, the middle men.

I don’t want to do any of that, I just want to write.   I remember thinking in my MPW program (Masters of Professional Writing), why don’t they have a cross-departmental program for the people learning to be writers with the people learning to become agents? Why can’t we help each other instead of “here’s your diploma, go figure out how to wave it in front of the right faces.” I don’t like to wave anything in front of anyone. I wrote to the department, but nothing came of it—like so much of what I write, I wonder if anyone even really read it.

Foolish:

It is foolish to drive yourself to the brink for such a thankless activity. Writing doesn’t pay, and it takes years to master.

That’s thousands of hours of working at writing to get proficient, then good, then hopefully mastering your craft.

Foolish is continuing despite people thinking you are wasting your time, who will not read or think about the work you’ve spent hours, months and years agonizing over.

Foolish is ultimately not caring what anyone thinks.   Why? Because you have to write. It’s in your DNA.

And so I continue to write because being foolish is better than never writing again.

            ANGRY in myself in being angry at the system and not working in or around the system to become a well-paid writer. I know how it works, or at least I think I do, so why do I just complain about it?

I know I can’t change it, and I know it won’t go away, and I know that just hating it won’t accomplish a thing. And yet I feel so defeated by it all.

By the connections. By the networking. By the self-promotion.

And then I don’t hate the system nearly as much as I hate myself, as I know within me I could probably work around it, and not become corrupted by it, but it still is so odious.

And there’s so much else too. Like where does one put their emphasis? Which project? Two nights ago, I was up and couldn’t sleep. I told my girlfriend I wasn’t afraid of failure. I was afraid that there’s a threshold of how much failure I think I’ll allow myself before I think, “gotta get that job I hate.”

So, though I know failure is necessary, if I avoid actually putting it out there, I can avoid the failures, and then I can avoid hitting the threshold. I can still write this way, still do creative things. But I know it’s a fool’s way. And that’s why I’m angry, angry that I can see how I’m acting foolish, and yet am not correcting my actions.

Dramatist:

I think everyone has a style they gravitate towards.   Some writers are uniquely gifted to be comedians, romantics, or idealists.

I am a dramatist. I go dark because I am fascinated by the interplay of good and bad, purity and evil, and walking the line between the yin and yang of it.

I have tried to write happy – fairytales and such, but it tends to twist towards a story that offers insight and catharsis into humanity.

I write what I am curious about, and human foibles fascinate me. Thus, I cannot help but stray into the thick of the drama of our human lives.

And that is why I identify as a dramatist.

8. From your own writing, quote (1) a favorite line and (2) a favorite scene. What makes it something special to you?

presents “Two Voices” – a discussion about writing
by 2 writers, Alfred Brown and Anh Thi
 (male) ALFRED (female) ANH
(1) A favorite line: “Everything was fine until I got shot in the face.”

It came to me, years before I wrote an entire poem around it, about a hard-boiled detective that got shot in the face. I thought it would make for a great opening for something. There’s a certain brutality and abruptness to it, that pairs nicely with the casual off-handedness of “everything was fine until” (which is usually in reference to a social outing and followed by something banal like “the valet forgot which key was ours” or “uncle Frank got drunk on eggnog and started talking politics”—being shot in the face would be more interesting, I think.

(2) A favorite scene:

When I was in junior high, I started writing a story about an adventurer that meanders about and meets people/creatures that waste his time, kind of in an Alice in Wonderland or Phantom Tollbooth way. In one scene, the character wasting the adventurer’s time wouldn’t stop wasting it until he solved a riddle.

He said “There’s only one absolute in the world, what is it?” I believe I wrote that part without even knowing what the answer was, or the next line, which is how all of that story went and why it was enjoyable enough to keep coming back to write it.

I wrote the adventurer’s line as I was at the same time thinking the question back to myself: “There’s only one absolute in the world?” And the answer struck me instantly, and the character confirmed it: “Yes! Exactly.”

And then there was some reward of a trinket of mild thematic importance. That’s when writing is most enjoyable, when the story writes itself and you get to be its first reader.

(1) A favorite line:   “It was her mouth. Followed by full lips wrapped around tongue and teeth.”

I liked that description of a vampire’s assets, along with the sexual connotations of it – a visceral way to introduce Raven.

What is a vampire if not sexy and sexual? And what is a woman if not objectified by her parts? So it was perfect to introduce her by the part that makes her uniquely vampire and female.

 

 

(2) A favorite scene:

“Memory is such a chameleon. It shifts itself into such elusive forms of the heart, to shadow the soul.”

That was how I started a scene of a young girl remembering her friend who died of cancer when they were in first grade, by capturing her fleeting memories of Thy as she grows up.

But it’s not Thy who’s important. It’s rather her memory and how it defines the young girl as she grows up.

I end the scene with a repetition of the line I started the scene with.              “From what I remember, Thy was my best friend. From what I remember, Thy is my hope, my self. Memory is such a chameleon. It shifts itself into such elusive forms of the heart, to shadow the soul.”

I liked the way meaning shifts for that sentence, now that the reader has glimpses into what shadows our character’s soul – the elusive memory of her best friend. I hope the impact of those 2 lines resonates more because we get that memory plays tricks on people, and what we remember is more important about what it reveals about us, not about what or who we actually remember.

7. Quote a line from your favorite writer, and explain what it means to you (1) individually and (2) as a writer.

presents “Two Voices” – a discussion about writing
by 2 writers, Alfred Brown and Anh Thi
 (male) ALFRED (female) ANH
            If it wasn’t clear from question #5, I don’t think I have a single favorite writer. It was hard to just mention those, and I’m loathe to shorten that list to one. (Side note: Turns out Richard Adams, writer of Watership Down, died a few hours later on Christmas eve after I wrote that.)

Instead, I will reference a favorite song lyric, and I don’t even know who wrote it (apparently, Bert Berns: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bert_Berns, and he’s apparently written a lot of great songs), and I’m partial especially as it is sung by one of my favorite singers (the late Solomon Burke) in the song “Cry to Me”:

“Loneliness, loneliness, such a waste of time.”
Ellsworth Toohey: “Mr. Roark, we’re alone here. Why don’t you tell me what you think of me? In any words you wish. Nobody will ever hear us.
Howard Roark: “But I don’t think of you.”
-From Ayn Rand’s novel, The Fountainhead
(1) What it means to me individually:

Loneliness is a non-productive emotion and state of being. When one is lonely, one’s loneliness consumes one’s mind. Most times that loneliness comes with yearning for companionship, and yet when lonely that yearning often comes with an inability to seek out companionship. It’s like a horrible condition worse than most unrequited desires, because it self-perpetuates the misery.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2) What it means as a writer:

It has a clever metonym of “loneliness” for “time spent being lonely.” It takes an emotion (loneliness), which is normally something outside of time, and forces you to think of it in a temporal sense (the time spent), so that it could be considered within the set (wasted time).

The meaning would change if you just said “Loneliness is such a waste.” Then it would mean the emotion of loneliness is a waste within one’s set of emotions. But who cares? When emotions have no time to them, then there’s an infinite supply.

If the line were rephrased “the time spent being lonely is wasted,” the meaning would be the same, but that incongruity in comparison terms would be lost. The listener would not need to make sense of the line, might miss the message, and might miss the importance of time being of limited supply.

(1) What it means to me individually:

It’s the ultimate diss. This character, Toohey, is out to destroy everything Roark stands for, and is quite successful at it. Yet, it doesn’t matter to Roark because Toohey’s machinations are nothing compared to what really matters: designing and building.

That’s what writing is to me, and it is a lovely way to think of people who stand in your way. I simply don’t have to.

Reading those 6 words meant that I could let go of what other people thought. Just like that, I can put that energy into doing what I love instead of explaining why I write, and fighting to do it.

(2) What it means as a writer:

To Roark, architecture is everything and he builds with an integrity and fervor that is akin to religious martyrdom. As Roark says: “A building is alive, like a man. Its integrity is to follow its own truth, its one single theme, and to serve its own single purpose.

So nothing and no man’s actions stand in the way of Roark’s art and his craft. And that inspires me as a writer because writing and being a writer is not just a thing I do. It is my passion and, at times, my burden. But it’s what I choose.

Those who have tried to steer me away from writing because it’s not a career path, or something that pays the bills, I get they want what they want for me because they think they know what’s best. Or they don’t support it because they don’t get it.

But it doesn’t matter what they want anymore, and I can just stop thinking about them, and simply think about writing and how to be a writer.

6. About our writing process (revisited)

presents “Two Voices” – a discussion about writing
by 2 writers, Alfred Brown and Anh Thi
  (male) ALFRED (female) ANH
I don’t have a set process, by any means. More like typical ingredients. Anxiety, as mentioned, is a common ingredient.

Not “common” as in ubiquitous, but “common” as in often.   Isolation is frequent and, again, not required. Different ingredients will bring about different flavors. Different mindsets (chemically induced or emotional) bring about different concoctions. Rarely is one better than the other, simply different.

Having a set process doesn’t work for me either.   I like to flow with the idea of the moment. And there isn’t one thing that gets me into the mindset of writing.

I just have to do it. Most times, it’s a chore, which is not the best way to describe what I love, but it is work and work is not always fun. So you just have to resolve to do it.

And that’s the only way I can get anything done, is to simply saying “I’m doing this” and then following through on my word.

I do not have to be in alone or in a crowd, but I do have to be left alone. I’m not much of a multi-tasker, so if someone is trying to have a conversation with me at the same time, that’s going to impede. When I’m anxious and in a more social setting, I’ll likely draw instead of write, because that can be stopped and started easily, and I won’t mind as much the interruptions.

I don’t handwrite, such as in a journal, because no one’s going to transcribe what I write in a journal, including myself, as even I’m not really able to read my own handwriting. Typing my words is better for dissemination, organization, reference.

I use outlines depending on the format. Screenplays require them, as the structure is stricter than a straightjacket, but poetry does not. Maybe epic poetry does, as it is epically long, but regular poetry needs little more than meter and rhyme schemes. Frankly, I only do outlines when I have to, because they take a lot of the fun out.

Editing is almost always good to do. For years, decades, I avoided it, as it was not (and never has become) fun. And it is a skill in itself that may actually hurt some work, until you are experienced enough to use it without killing the spirit. That’s why I keep all my drafts because you can see the point where you “over-edit” and help avoid it. Basically, I now edit unless the project is unimportant and I’m completely bored with it.

I have to be alone to write. I must focus solely on the world and characters of my story, rather than the real world and the characters that live and breathe in reality (because reality is distracting as it is maddening and inspiring too).

And I have to type. My thoughts come too quickly when I get into the swing of things, and writing would cripple my flow. It’s effort to get into the space and frame of mine to write, and I’m not wasting that energy with the sluggishness of handwriting.

I guess that makes me a writer for today’s world, where we have lost the art of handwriting and the measured communication of letter writing.

We Facebook, Twitter, e-mail, Instagram, etc.   We create the stories of our lives through social media and we become the character we want through the Internet.

We measure our communication in bytes, and we do it fast. Growing up like that, it’s natural to type and never handwrite.

Not that I haven’t tried, but it doesn’t feel natural.   As for drafts, I don’t keep them anymore. I just write over it. I’ve learned that I never look back at my drafts, though I will take notes on my ideas, storyline, and characters. Otherwise, I’d forget details and traits that fade away when I step from my story world into the real world, and vice versa.

5. Who inspires you? Why?

presents “Two Voices” – a discussion about writing
by 2 writers, Alfred Brown and Anh Thi

(male) ALFRED

I’m hesitant to create a list, because I’m afraid to leave out anyone.  But it’s the writers who helped me through my hardest times that encourage me.  And these are not the same people who give seminars to encourage people to be writers.

They are just writers whom I like.  I’ve read pretty much all Murakami’s work, and I read the big four of Faulkner’s novels, and I thought Watership Down was great.

I love to read Dickinson when it comes to poetry, and Bob Dylan and 2pac are both amazing as well (just hard to think of their work separate from the music).  Hamlet is probably my favorite play, though I do like Beckett and Pinter and Stoppard.

But do they inspire me?  More like, when that child of reason wants to remind me that it’s waste of time, that irrational addict part of me wants something to grasp onto.  It grasps on their anecdotal successes that should in no way sway me because they are so few.

But I don’t ever think of it so directly as specific writers, if I did, I’d see it too rationally to be effective.  I just think, well, some people have done it, some people have made something that affects people, they’ve affected me, maybe…  And I just leave it at that, often it’s enough.

(female) ANH

I am inspired by love and passion. When writers and artists express what they love tempered with skill, it entrances me. Work that is framed by passion is something to pay attention to. Dickinson, Shakespeare! Ayn Rand. Lennon, Swift. They’ve succeeded in capturing an aspect of the human condition in a work that can make us feel, make us think, or encourage us to think.

We lead such busy lives. There’s so much noise in the world, and in our heads. So to be able to stop for a moment, entranced by the expression of another person’s voice. That is something, that someone got you to pause, breathe, think, feel or enjoy a few moments outside of that noise. And that is inspiring.

4. What are the challenges of being a writer? Of writing?

presents “Two Voices” – a discussion about writing
by 2 writers, Alfred Brown and Anh Thi
 (male) ALFRED (female) ANH
What you are escaping (because you must come back). Getting started is hardest for me. It’s such an effort to get the courage to actually begin to put words down.
The fact that the something you make, might mean nothing at all. Facing my demons – the excuses, fears, doubts, worries, and all the other things that combine to stop me from doing the thing I want to do – start writing and finish writing.
The crash after the thrill because you remember that yesterday what you made, and all the yesterdays before, haven’t seemed to mean much to anyone, and nothing suggests tomorrow, or the tomorrows to come, will be any different. Writers have to become constructive editors of their own work (or risk bloating the writing with tangents and meanderings), and that’s a hard thing to do constructively. Where does the writing end, and the editing begin? It’s a hard line to balance, but a challenge that must be continually met.
1 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 121